The Theory of Citizenship as A Medium in Promoting Public Policy

Keywords: theory citizenship, public policy

Abstract

This study was aimed to find a theory about the study of civic education developed as a medium in promoting the public policy. This study used a qualitative approach, with the type of library research to explore liberal, communitarian and republican theories, with data sources consisting of textbooks, journals, and magazines with criteria of relevancy principles relating to research. While the technique of data collection using focused study, with primary source method is Th. Marshall and secondary sources of Peter H. Schuck (2003), Pettit 1997 and Thomas Janoski & Brian Gran (2002). This study showed that the theory of civic education on the concept of communitarian republican was very appropriate in promoting public policy, while liberal theory only leads to political democracy about the freedom to express opinions; however other elements were not appropriate because of it against the values of Pancasila.

Author Biographies

Patma Tuasikal, Miss, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Biak

Patma Tuasikal is a lecturer at Civic Education Department of Biak Educational Science and teaching Training College (Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Biak)

Andre Paulus Saleky, Mr., Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Biak

Andre Paulus Saleky is an english lecturer with home base department is Civic Education Department at Biak Educational Science and Teaching training College (Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Biak)

References

Aristoteles. (1998). politic. Translated by Barker. New York: Oxford University Press.

Boyte, H. C. (2003). A Different Kind of Politics: John Dewey and the Meaning of Citizenship in the 21st Century. The Good Society, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2004.0004

Boyte, H. C. (2009). Civic agency and the Cult of the expert. Kettering Foundation.

Bruegger, J. A., D, J., & M, L. (2011). Republican Freedom: Three Problems. The Journal Jurisprudence, (1997), 569–588.

Carabain, C., Keulemans, S., Gent, M. van, & Spitz, G. (2012). Global Citizenship From Public Support to Activate Participation. Amsterdam. Retrieved from www.fsc.org

Cochran, C. L., & Malone, E. F. (2014). Public Policy: Perspectives and Choices (5th ed.). Lynne Rienner. Retrieved from www.rienner.com

Geurts, Thei. (2014). Public policy making: The21Century perspective. The Netherlands: be informed.

Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2002). Handbook of Citizenship Studies edited by Engin F Isin & Bryan S Turner. (E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner, Eds.). London, California, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://shora.tabriz.ir/Uploads/83/cms/user/File/657/E_Book/Urban Studies/HANDBOOK of CITIZENSH P STUDIES.pdf#page=26

Miller, F. D. (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Nurlinah, & Haryanto. (2017). Citizenship Pluralism : Between Policy, Paradigm and Local Value in Indonesia. Sci. Int (Lahore), 29(1), 285–290. Retrieved from http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/636318604147241559.pdf

Pettit, Philip (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Samsuri. (2014). Teori-teori kewarganegaraan.

Schuck, Peter H. (2003) Diversity in America: Keeping Government at a Safe Distance. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Taufiqurokhman. (2014). Kebijakan Publik: Pendelegasian Tanggung Jawab Negara Kepada Presiden Selaku Penyelenggara Pemerintahan. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Moestopo Beragama Pers.

Thomas Janoski and Brian Gran. "Political Citizenship "Handbook of Citizenship Studies. Ed. Engin F. Isin and Bryan S. Turner. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2002. 13-52.

Tracy, J. S. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Willey-Blackwell A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.,. https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.43.1.6

Turgeon, J., & Savard, J. F. (2012). Public Policy. In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration. The reference for understanding government action (pp. 1–4). Retrieved from www.dictionnaire.enap.ca

Warella, Y. (2004). Kepentingan umum dan kepentingan perseorangan. Dialogue JIAKP, 1(3), 381–391.

Weber, Max (1949) “The Meaning of ‘Ethical Neutrality in sociology and economic, Methodology of Social Science, (eds). Edward A. Shilss dan Henry A. Finch (Glencoe: Free Press, 1949).

Winarno. (2015). Pemikiran aristoteles tentang kewarganegaraan dan konstitusi. Humanika, 21(1), 1–7.
Published
2018-07-29
Section
Articles